Salmah Rizvi: Rights defended with the Brotherhood to exploit the American anger

Aya Ezz

Salmah Rizvi, a former intelligence analyst in the government of former US President Barack Obama, has been one of the most prominent figures used by the terrorist Brotherhood in the United States to exploit the wave of anger and protests that followed the killing of George Floyd at the hands of the police.

Brotherhood games

The American website Geller Report, run by Pamela Geller, has launched a media campaign to expose all those who have collaborated with Qatar and the Brotherhood since the outbreak of the demonstrations.

According to Geller, Rizvi works extensively in the field of human rights and therefore the terrorist group turned to her, taking advantage of her defense of human rights to achieve its illegitimate goals in America.

Rizvi has used her profession as a lawyer to support the Brotherhood’s goals. She recently defended Urooj Rahman, who is accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at a police car in New York. Rizvi expressed great sympathy for her and was able to get her out of detention on a bail of $250,000.

Rizvi had received a scholarship to attend New York University’s (NYU) School of Law under the auspices of Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is described as anti-Semitic and largely supports terrorism.

Inciting riots

The Geller Report said that Rizvi had a great role during the past months in inciting citizens to demonstrate, convincing a large number of citizens that US President Donald Trump tortures prisoners, antagonizes colored people, and will enact laws to destroy the rights of African-Americans.

She also went to Islamic communities and mosques throughout America and incited them to take to the streets to supposedly defend the rights of Islam, even though Muslims enjoy all their Islamic rights in the country.

Relationships with Brotherhood charities

The Geller Report pointed out that Rizvi was frequenting charitable associations affiliated with the Brotherhood recently. Nobody knows what occurred between them, although it is expected that the reason for these visits was regarding the incitement of demonstrations.