Refuting Allegations of Brotherhood Leader Ibrahim Munir before the Hearing session at the UK’s House of Commons (2016)

With a heavy heart, we all have followed the brutal terror attack that claimed many innocent lives right in the heart of the beautiful city of London. This horrific attack, which was part of the systemic violence cycle and terrorist series targeting Europe at large, had started in Belgium, France, and Germany and eventually in Britain.

No doubt that this recent attack only confirms and supports our position, as being one of the specialized research centers studying political Islam for decades, that the Muslim Brotherhood (Brotherhood) is a major supporter of terrorism in the world.  This support can be manifested in the fact that the Brotherhood has always been the source from which all Jihadist groups and individuals derive their extremist ideas and ex-communicative (or takfiri) thinking as enshrined in the literature of its ideologues and interlocutors, or in its generous funding of some terrorist elements, providing them with material and logistical support, and various types of assistance in Britain.

The Brotherhood group tries more often than not to disassociate itself from terrorism and gild its tarnished image before British public opinion and the British House of Commons during the hearing sessions in which London-based Brotherhood leader Ibrahim Munir testified, despite the fact that the Brotherhood tends to reveal its true face from time to time, spewing hate and extremism that only stand for its intellectual perversion and mendacity.

Munir is the most senior member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in the United Kingdom he is currently the Secretary General of the International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Can you imagine that the activities of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood and the International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood are coordinated from the Muslim Brotherhood office at Cricklewood Broadway in London by Munir and others?.

Therefore, this monograph, I have written, seeks to refute the false arguments of the Brotherhood, clarifying their misleading, manipulative and rabble-rousing rhetoric. I write this particularly in response to what Ibrahim Munir himself said during the hearing, citing the Brotherhood’s literature itself to make the case against them.

I will show how the Brotherhood’s rhetoric and violent record proves the opposite of the claims put forward by Munir by contesting them with methodical and scholarly argument.  The points of the counter-argument here are presented with cogency and force as you will come to see in the next few pages.